Cekura (formerly Vocera AI)

Are scope, spend, and authority enforced while the agent runs?

No enforced limits. Cekura tests and monitors voice agents; nothing on the captured homepage claims it constrains scope, spend or authority at run time. permission_scopes and runtime_governance are both recorded no_public_information against this capture, and the capture genuinely does not discuss either. Hand-scored by the Fact-Checker 2026-08-23.

Is there a tamper-evident record of what it actually did?

A record exists and is customer-reviewable but is not tamper-evident. Vendor states it can "Monitor real conversations as they happen, track voice-specific quality signals, tune your LLM judges, and get alerted on what matters", and offers replay of past conversations. Nothing on the capture claims immutability, hash-chaining or tamper-evidence, and the record covers the customer's agent rather than Cekura's own actions. Hand-scored by the Fact-Checker 2026-08-23.

Are compliance obligations attached per engagement?

Nothing published. No certification, framework alignment or audit claim about Cekura itself appears on the capture. Checked for false absence rather than assumed: the strings "SOC 2", "ISO 27", "HIPAA" are absent from the 4,702-character capture, and the single occurrence of "compliance" is a product feature ("Skipping compliance checks suddenly? Test key flows for missing disclaimers") describing what Cekura tests in the customer's agent, not a posture Cekura holds. No public evidence found. Hand-scored by the Fact-Checker 2026-08-23.

Our automated recount on Sep 11, 2026 counted enough evidenced fields for 1/3. It never reads what those fields say, so it does not overturn the score above, judged on Aug 23, 2026 — but where the two disagree it is a reason to read this dimension again. Why there are two scores

Judged Aug 23, 2026; evidence newer. We have since re-read Compliance certifications, most recently on Sep 9, 2026. No one has re-scored this dimension against it — the score above stands, but it is older than the evidence below it. How current a score is

Does payment depend on a verified result?

Paid regardless of result. No pricing of any kind is published on the capture (pricing_model is no_public_information and the string "pricing" does not appear), so nothing ties payment to a verified outcome. No public evidence found. Hand-scored by the Fact-Checker 2026-08-23.

Can the deployment be insured, and is the customer indemnified?

No cover, no indemnity. The strings "insur" and "indemn" do not appear anywhere in the capture; insurance_available, indemnification and liability_cap are all no_public_information and verified as true absences rather than false ones. No public evidence found. Hand-scored by the Fact-Checker 2026-08-23.