OpenCode vs Qodo
55 fields both were evaluated on, 33 of them different — including where one discloses something the other does not. Every value links to the document it came from. 22 further fields are disclosed by neither and are listed at the end rather than tabled.
Assurance
| Field | OpenCode | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Audit trail· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Audit trail Every issue and compliance flag logged for full traceability.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Explainability· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Qodo provides context-aware code suggestions that detect critical issues, logic gaps, enforce standards, and accelerate reviews with accurate, actionable insights.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 23, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Runtime governance· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Governance VISIBILITY Visibility into every issue, in one place Track critical findings, resolution rates and open issues across every repo and pull request in one view”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 23, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Permission scopes· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Rules and skills run on every PR, decay when they stop being useful, and stay measurable through a central portal.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Compliance certifications· | SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 compliant “SOC 2 Type 2 Compliant SOC 2 Type 1 Compliant”trust.opencode.ai · checked Sep 21, 2026 | “SOC 2 Type II certified Independently audited security controld, not just a self-attestation.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| SLA terms· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Enterprise plans add SSO/SAML, BYOK, single-tenant or on-prem deployment, and priority support.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
Agency
| Field | OpenCode | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Human oversight· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Qodo does about 90% of that initial code review, and then it’s really just the final 10% where humans get involved.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Goal complexity· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Qodo provides context-aware code suggestions that detect critical issues, logic gaps, enforce standards, and accelerate reviews with accurate, actionable insights.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 23, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Action space· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Qodo provides context-aware code suggestions that detect critical issues, logic gaps, enforce standards, and accelerate reviews with accurate, actionable insights.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 23, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Operating environment· | terminal, IDE, or desktop “OpenCode is an open source agent that helps you write code in your terminal, IDE, or desktop.”opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Qodo runs across two main surfaces, with the same context and review standards in each: IDE — real-time code validation while you code Git — high-signal pull request reviews”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Initiative· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Specialized agents run on every pull request, surfacing real bugs, rule violations, and requirement gaps with full codebase context.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
Safety
| Field | OpenCode | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Safety evaluations· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “SOC 2 Type II certified Independently audited security controld, not just a self-attestation.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Red teaming· | Third-party penetration test conducted, report available in trust center “Anomaly Penetration Test Report.pdf”trust.opencode.ai · checked Sep 21, 2026 | no public information qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Safety policy· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “We take security, privacy and compliance seriously.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Incident reporting· | Formal policy covers incident response and breach notification “Incident Response & Breach Notification”trust.opencode.ai · checked Sep 21, 2026 | no public information qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Third-party evaluations· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “SOC 2 Type II certified Independently audited security controld, not just a self-attestation.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Data handling· | “Built for privacy first [*] OpenCode does not store any of your code or context data”opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Zero data retention Your code is analyzed and discarded. Nothing stored, logged, or used to train models.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
Practicality
| Field | OpenCode | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Qodo’s Pro Team plan is credit-based at $0.012 per credit, pooled across the team .”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Price point· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | Credit packs on the Pro Team plan: 2,500 credits (~18 reviews/month), 5,000 (~36/month), 20,000 (~144/month), at $0.012 per credit. “2,500 credits — ~18 reviews/month”qodo.ai · checked Sep 2, 2026 |
| Availability· | Desktop app is offered as a beta download; no availability status is stated for the CLI “Download the desktop beta now”opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 23, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | |
| Deployment options· | macOS, Windows, and Linux “Available on macOS, Windows, and Linux . Download now”opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 23, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | “On-premises deployment Deploy entirely within your own infrastructure, with no external data exposure. Single-tenant deployment Your own dedicated instance – no shared infrastructure, no shared risk.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Integrations· | Models.dev “Any model 75+ LLM providers through Models.dev, including local models”opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Git providers GitHub (cloud and Enterprise Server), GitLab (cloud and self-managed), Bitbucket (Cloud and Data Center), Azure DevOps. Gerrit on Enterprise. IDEs VS Code, JetBrains (IntelliJ, PyCharm, WebStorm, GoLand, CLion, RubyMine, PhpStorm), Visual Studio.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Support model· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Enterprise plans add SSO/SAML, BYOK, single-tenant or on-prem deployment, and priority support.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
Foundation models
| Field | OpenCode | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Base models· | Claude, GPT, Gemini “connect any model from any provider, including Claude, GPT, Gemini and more.”opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “BYOK — bring your own OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, or self-hosted models.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Model provider· | any provider, including Claude, GPT, Gemini “connect any model from any provider, including Claude, GPT, Gemini and more.”opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “BYOK — bring your own OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, or self-hosted models.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Model swappable· | “BYOK — bring your own OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, or self-hosted models.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
Ecosystem
| Field | OpenCode | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Protocols supported· | no public information qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | |
| Tool use· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Qodo provides context-aware code suggestions that detect critical issues, logic gaps, enforce standards, and accelerate reviews with accurate, actionable insights.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 23, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Multi-agent· | Start multiple agents in parallel on the same project “Multi-session Start multiple agents in parallel on the same project”opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “High-precision multi-agent code review across the SDLC, with full codebase context.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Open source· | no public information qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
Impact
| Field | OpenCode | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| User base· | Reports 195,000 GitHub stars, 950 contributors and 13,000+ commits alongside 16M monthly developers. The repository counts are checkable on GitHub; the 16M developer figure is the vendor's own, with no counter named “With over 195,000 GitHub stars, 950 contributors, and over 13,000 commits, OpenCode is used and trusted by over 16M developers every month.”opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 23, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | Site displays three usage stat counters (900.1K / 646.5K / 12.8K, unlabeled in the capture), updated again from the prior 896.6K/644.3K/12.6K. “900.1K 646.5K 12.8K”qodo.ai · checked Sep 2, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 23, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Deployment scale· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | “Qodo is an AI code review and governance platform for engineering teams shipping at the speed AI writes code.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Target sectors· | no public information opencode.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | Enterprise (SSO/SAML, BYOK, single-tenant/on-prem deployment, priority support) “Enterprise plans add SSO/SAML, BYOK, single-tenant or on-prem deployment, and priority support.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 18, 2026 |
Disclosed by neither
Both OpenCode and Qodo publish nothing on these 22 fields. That is a finding about the category rather than a difference between them, so it is recorded here instead of as 22 identical table rows. Each is shown with its source check on the individual profiles.
- Autonomy level
- High-risk domains
- Documented incidents
- Supported regions
- Open weights
- Fine-tuning
- Context window
- API access
- Marketplace presence
- Usage restrictions
- Model or system card
- Insurance available
- Insurance carriers
- Coverage limits
- Indemnification
- Liability cap
- Tamper-evident log
- Regulatory alignment
- Outcome-based pricing
- Settlement mechanism
- Dispute process
- Evaluation coverage
Questions
- How do OpenCode and Qodo compare on user base?
- OpenCode: Reports 195,000 GitHub stars, 950 contributors and 13,000+ commits alongside 16M monthly developers. The repository counts are checkable on GitHub; the 16M developer figure is the vendor's own, with no counter named. Qodo: Site displays three usage stat counters (900.1K / 646.5K / 12.8K, unlabeled in the capture), updated again from the prior 896.6K/644.3K/12.6K..
- How do OpenCode and Qodo compare on target sectors?
- OpenCode: no public information disclosed. Qodo: Enterprise (SSO/SAML, BYOK, single-tenant/on-prem deployment, priority support).
- How do OpenCode and Qodo compare on price point?
- OpenCode: no public information disclosed. Qodo: Credit packs on the Pro Team plan: 2,500 credits (~18 reviews/month), 5,000 (~36/month), 20,000 (~144/month), at $0.012 per credit..
- How do OpenCode and Qodo compare on protocols supported?
- OpenCode: LSP. Qodo: no public information disclosed.
- How do OpenCode and Qodo compare on open source?
- OpenCode: open source. Qodo: no public information disclosed.
- How do OpenCode and Qodo compare on red teaming?
- OpenCode: Third-party penetration test conducted, report available in trust center. Qodo: no public information disclosed.