agent · recruiting ai agents
Fribl vs Pin
55 fields both were evaluated on, 23 of them different — including where one discloses something the other does not. Every value links to the document it came from. 32 further fields are disclosed by neither and are listed at the end rather than tabled.
Assurance
| Field | Fribl | Pin |
|---|---|---|
| Audit trail· | no public information www.fribl.co · checked Aug 2, 2026 | Full history of every candidate interaction in one place. “Total Visibility Full history of every candidate interaction in one place.”pin.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 |
| Explainability· | “A precise explanation of the results obtained”www.fribl.co · checked Aug 2, 2026 | “Pin summarizes exactly why a candidate is or isn’t a match.”pin.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 |
| Permission scopes· | no public information www.fribl.co · checked Aug 2, 2026 | granular permissioning “Customer data is encrypted end-to-end, with access gated by authentication, network security, and granular permissioning.”pin.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 |
| Compliance certifications· | no public information www.fribl.co · checked Aug 2, 2026 | SOC 2 Type 2 Compliant “SOC 2 Type 2 Compliant Our controls and policies have been audited by a third party to ensure the highest level of security with your data.”pin.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 |
| Regulatory alignment· | “No AI Act compatibility, as uniquely based on generic LLMs: creating hallucinations, lack of transparency and no results explanations.”www.fribl.co · checked Aug 2, 2026 |
Safety
| Field | Fribl | Pin |
|---|---|---|
| Third-party evaluations· | no public information www.fribl.co · checked Aug 2, 2026 | Third-party audited “SOC 2 Type 2 Encrypted at rest & in transit Third-party audited”pin.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 |
| Data handling· | no public information www.fribl.co · checked Aug 2, 2026 | Customer data is encrypted at rest and in transit, classified, and subject to a data retention and secure disposal policy; handling is limited to production-only customer data. “Data security Comprehensive safeguards protect customer information throughout its lifecycle, from classification to encryption and secure disposal. Encryption at rest Encryption in transit Data classification policy Data retention and secure disposal Production-only customer data handling”trust.pin.com · checked Sep 9, 2026 |
Practicality
| Field | Fribl | Pin |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model· | seat, usage “Monthly Annual 25% off Free $0 free forever For anyone looking to see what Pin is all about. Try For Free 5 contact lookup credits per week 1 Job position 1 AI Agent Email-only sequences Solo $99 per month, per user, billed annually only on annual billing For individual recruiters getting started. Try For Free Single seat · solo recruiters Unlimited job positions 500 contact lookup credits AI sourcing & agents included Multi-channel outreach sequences Most Popular Professional $135 $179 per month, per user , billed annually For agencies and hiring teams running multiple roles. Try For Free AI sourcing & agents included 1,000 credits per seat / month Team collaboration & shared inbox Email + LinkedIn + SMS sequences Advanced agent sourcing Business $225 $299 per month, per user , billed annually For growing recruiting orgs with custom workflows. Book a Demo Everything in Professional 2,000 credits per seat / month Premium ATS integrations SOC 2 compliance docs Priority support & onboarding”pin.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 17, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | |
| Price point· | no public information www.fribl.co · checked Aug 2, 2026 | $225 $299 per month, per user , billed annually “Business $225 $299 per month, per user , billed annually”pin.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 17, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Availability· | ||
| Deployment options· | no public information pin.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | |
| Integrations· | Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Bullhorn, iCIMS, and Jobvite “Pin integrates with 120+ applicant tracking systems including Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Bullhorn, iCIMS, and Jobvite.”pin.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | |
| Supported regions· | no public information pin.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | |
| Support model· | “Priority support & onboarding”pin.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 17, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
Foundation models
| Field | Fribl | Pin |
|---|---|---|
| Base models· | “Fribl leverages cutting-edge Generative AI technology”www.fribl.co · checked Aug 2, 2026 | no public information pin.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 |
| Model provider· | no public information www.fribl.co · checked Aug 2, 2026 | Lists Anthropic and Google Cloud as subprocessors supplying AI and LLM models (Cloudflare is listed separately as a WAF/DNS/CDN provider). “Anthropic · United States AI and LLM models United States Cloudflare · United States Serves as a WAF, DNS, and CDN for Pin services United States Google Cloud · United States We use Google’s Generative AI and LLM models”trust.pin.com · checked Sep 9, 2026 |
Ecosystem
| Field | Fribl | Pin |
|---|---|---|
| Protocols supported· | ||
| Multi-agent· | no public information pin.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | |
| API access· | “Fribl is an AI-powered Intelligent Matching API”www.fribl.co · checked Aug 2, 2026 | no public information pin.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 |
Impact
| Field | Fribl | Pin |
|---|---|---|
| User base· | Named customers Lithic, Expa, Range, and Radar, per the vendor's trust center. “Trusted by Lithic Expa Range Radar”trust.pin.com · checked Sep 9, 2026 | |
| Deployment scale· | no public information pin.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | |
| Target sectors· | no public information www.fribl.co · checked Aug 2, 2026 | |
| High-risk domains· | no public information www.fribl.co · checked Aug 2, 2026 |
Disclosed by neither
Both Fribl and Pin publish nothing on these 32 fields. That is a finding about the category rather than a difference between them, so it is recorded here instead of as 32 identical table rows. Each is shown with its source check on the individual profiles.
- Autonomy level
- Human oversight
- Goal complexity
- Action space
- Operating environment
- Initiative
- Documented incidents
- Model swappable
- Open weights
- Fine-tuning
- Context window
- Tool use
- Open source
- Marketplace presence
- Safety evaluations
- Red teaming
- Safety policy
- Usage restrictions
- Model or system card
- Incident reporting
- Insurance available
- Insurance carriers
- Coverage limits
- Indemnification
- Liability cap
- Tamper-evident log
- Runtime governance
- Outcome-based pricing
- Settlement mechanism
- Dispute process
- SLA terms
- Evaluation coverage
Questions
- How do Fribl and Pin compare on price point?
- Fribl: no public information disclosed. Pin: $225 $299 per month, per user , billed annually.
- How do Fribl and Pin compare on model provider?
- Fribl: no public information disclosed. Pin: Lists Anthropic and Google Cloud as subprocessors supplying AI and LLM models (Cloudflare is listed separately as a WAF/DNS/CDN provider)..
- How do Fribl and Pin compare on third-party evaluations?
- Fribl: no public information disclosed. Pin: Third-party audited.
- How do Fribl and Pin compare on data handling?
- Fribl: no public information disclosed. Pin: Customer data is encrypted at rest and in transit, classified, and subject to a data retention and secure disposal policy; handling is limited to production-only customer data..
- How do Fribl and Pin compare on audit trail?
- Fribl: no public information disclosed. Pin: Full history of every candidate interaction in one place..
- How do Fribl and Pin compare on permission scopes?
- Fribl: no public information disclosed. Pin: granular permissioning.