agent · ai-marketing-agents
iCustomer vs Sanity
55 fields both were evaluated on, 24 of them different — including where one discloses something the other does not. Every value links to the document it came from. 31 further fields are disclosed by neither and are listed at the end rather than tabled.
Assurance
| Field | iCustomer | Sanity |
|---|---|---|
| Audit trail· | Per-decision traces are claimed to be explainable and reviewable by the customer. No tamper-evidence, hash-chaining or immutability is claimed anywhere on the page. “Decision traces: every choice explainable and reviewable”www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | |
| Explainability· | “Decision traces: every choice explainable and reviewable”www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | no public information www.sanity.io · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Runtime governance· | Policy gates are claimed to constrain decisions at run time. Enforcement is asserted, not demonstrated; no mechanism, scope or spend ceiling is published. “Policy gates keep decisions inside your guardrails”www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | no public information www.sanity.io · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Permission scopes· | Policy gates are stated to control budget and audience scope. No further granularity (per-tool, per-action, per-channel) is published. “Budget and audience shifts inside policy gates you set”www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | no public information www.sanity.io · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Compliance certifications· | SOC 2 Type II claimed. Self-declared on the vendor's own page; no report, auditor or certificate is published on this capture. “iCustomer is built privacy-by-design and is SOC 2 Type II certified.”www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | |
| Regulatory alignment· | no public information www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | |
| SLA terms· | no public information www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 |
Agency
| Field | iCustomer | Sanity |
|---|---|---|
| Human oversight· | “Never outside guardrails you set. iCustomer is built for humans in the loop: your team brings the taste and judgment, the system does the opinionated data and decision-science heavy lifting to augment your creativity. Every action leaves an auditable trace your team can review, override, or roll back.”www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | no public information www.sanity.io · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Action space· | “iCustomer pushes each decision into the tools you already run and works your goal around the clock, adjusting as results come in, always inside rules you approve.”www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | no public information www.sanity.io · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Operating environment· | “iCustomer runs warehouse-native, including native on Snowflake, and computes in place, so your first-party data stays governed in your environment and only consented activation payloads flow to channels.”www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | no public information www.sanity.io · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Initiative· | “Always-on agent, self-serve”www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 17, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | no public information www.sanity.io · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
Safety
| Field | iCustomer | Sanity |
|---|---|---|
| Data handling· | Vendor states data remains in the customer's own data cloud and is not transferred to the vendor. No retention period, deletion commitment or training-use statement is published. “It lives in your data cloud, compounds with every cycle, and never leaks to a vendor.”www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 |
Practicality
| Field | iCustomer | Sanity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model· | “Free tier with usage-based pricing as you grow”www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | no public information www.sanity.io · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Availability· | no public information www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | |
| Deployment options· | Deployed into the customer's own data cloud; a headless CLI deployment path is offered for engineering teams. No SaaS/self-hosted/VPC breakdown is published. “CLI-led headless deploys for engineering teams”www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | “CLI Install Install Sanity and create a new project directly from your terminal. npm create sanity@latest”www.sanity.io · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Integrations· | “Activation in Meta, Google, LinkedIn, The Trade Desk, email”www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | “MCP Server Connect Sanity to your favorite tools like Cursor, Claude Code, v0, and more.”www.sanity.io · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Support model· | no public information www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 |
Ecosystem
| Field | iCustomer | Sanity |
|---|---|---|
| Protocols supported· | no public information www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | “MCP Server Connect Sanity to your favorite tools like Cursor, Claude Code, v0, and more.”www.sanity.io · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Tool use· | no public information www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | “Agent Actions for schema-aware AI automations Write once, use everywhere”www.sanity.io · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Multi-agent· | “iWorkers AI agents for every role An AI teammate for every role, one system, working your goals from your real data.”www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | no public information www.sanity.io · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| API access· | no public information www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 |
Impact
| Field | iCustomer | Sanity |
|---|---|---|
| User base· | no public information www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | |
| Deployment scale· | no public information www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 | |
| Target sectors· | D2C and B2B growth-marketing teams “One always-learning loop across D2C and B2B teams.”www.icustomer.ai · checked Aug 4, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 17, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | “Enterprise-grade everything Model, manage, automate, and scale structured content across all your brands, apps, and touch points.”www.sanity.io · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
Disclosed by neither
Both iCustomer and Sanity publish nothing on these 31 fields. That is a finding about the category rather than a difference between them, so it is recorded here instead of as 31 identical table rows. Each is shown with its source check on the individual profiles.
- Autonomy level
- Goal complexity
- High-risk domains
- Documented incidents
- Price point
- Supported regions
- Base models
- Model provider
- Model swappable
- Open weights
- Fine-tuning
- Context window
- Open source
- Marketplace presence
- Safety evaluations
- Red teaming
- Safety policy
- Usage restrictions
- Model or system card
- Incident reporting
- Third-party evaluations
- Insurance available
- Insurance carriers
- Coverage limits
- Indemnification
- Liability cap
- Tamper-evident log
- Outcome-based pricing
- Settlement mechanism
- Dispute process
- Evaluation coverage
Questions
- How do iCustomer and Sanity compare on user base?
- iCustomer: no public information disclosed. Sanity: 1M+ users and 6k+ teams.
- How do iCustomer and Sanity compare on runtime governance?
- iCustomer: Policy gates are claimed to constrain decisions at run time. Enforcement is asserted, not demonstrated; no mechanism, scope or spend ceiling is published.. Sanity: no public information disclosed.
- How do iCustomer and Sanity compare on permission scopes?
- iCustomer: Policy gates are stated to control budget and audience scope. No further granularity (per-tool, per-action, per-channel) is published.. Sanity: no public information disclosed.