Cursor vs Qodo
55 fields both were evaluated on, 31 of them different — including where one discloses something the other does not. Every value links to the document it came from. 24 further fields are disclosed by neither and are listed at the end rather than tabled.
Assurance
| Field | Cursor | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Audit trail· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “Audit trail Every issue and compliance flag logged for full traceability.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Explainability· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “Qodo provides context-aware code suggestions that detect critical issues, logic gaps, enforce standards, and accelerate reviews with accurate, actionable insights.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Runtime governance· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “Governance VISIBILITY Visibility into every issue, in one place Track critical findings, resolution rates and open issues across every repo and pull request in one view”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Permission scopes· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “Rules and skills run on every PR, decay when they stop being useful, and stay measurable through a central portal.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Compliance certifications· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “SOC 2 Type II certified Independently audited security controld, not just a self-attestation.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| SLA terms· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “Enterprise plans add SSO/SAML, BYOK, single-tenant or on-prem deployment, and priority support.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
Agency
| Field | Cursor | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Autonomy level· | full autonomy agentic version “In Cursor, you can do Cmd+K for targeted edits, or let it rip with the full autonomy agentic version.”cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | no public information qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Human oversight· | “Agents use their own computers to build, test, and demo features end to end for you to review.”cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “Qodo does about 90% of that initial code review, and then it’s really just the final 10% where humans get involved.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Goal complexity· | “Qodo provides context-aware code suggestions that detect critical issues, logic gaps, enforce standards, and accelerate reviews with accurate, actionable insights.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | |
| Action space· | “Qodo provides context-aware code suggestions that detect critical issues, logic gaps, enforce standards, and accelerate reviews with accurate, actionable insights.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | |
| Operating environment· | “Cursor runs in your terminal, collaborates in Slack, and reviews PRs in GitHub.”cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “Qodo runs across two main surfaces, with the same context and review standards in each: IDE — real-time code validation while you code Git — high-signal pull request reviews”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Initiative· | “Set up always-on agents that run on schedules or triggers to build, maintain, and fix your software.”cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “Specialized agents run on every pull request, surfacing real bugs, rule violations, and requirement gaps with full codebase context.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
Safety
| Field | Cursor | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Safety evaluations· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “SOC 2 Type II certified Independently audited security controld, not just a self-attestation.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Safety policy· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “We take security, privacy and compliance seriously.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Third-party evaluations· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “SOC 2 Type II certified Independently audited security controld, not just a self-attestation.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Data handling· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “Zero data retention Your code is analyzed and discarded. Nothing stored, logged, or used to train models.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
Practicality
| Field | Cursor | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “Qodo’s Pro Team plan is credit-based at $0.012 per credit, pooled across the team .”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Price point· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | Credit packs on the Pro Team plan: 2,500 credits (~18 reviews/month), 5,000 (~36/month), 20,000 (~144/month), at $0.012 per credit. “2,500 credits — ~18 reviews/month”qodo.ai · checked Sep 2, 2026 |
| Availability· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | |
| Deployment options· | Desktop application; macOS download offered on the homepage “Download for macOS”cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “On-premises deployment Deploy entirely within your own infrastructure, with no external data exposure. Single-tenant deployment Your own dedicated instance – no shared infrastructure, no shared risk.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Integrations· | “Cursor runs in your terminal, collaborates in Slack, and reviews PRs in GitHub.”cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “Git providers GitHub (cloud and Enterprise Server), GitLab (cloud and self-managed), Bitbucket (Cloud and Data Center), Azure DevOps. Gerrit on Enterprise. IDEs VS Code, JetBrains (IntelliJ, PyCharm, WebStorm, GoLand, CLion, RubyMine, PhpStorm), Visual Studio.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Support model· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “Enterprise plans add SSO/SAML, BYOK, single-tenant or on-prem deployment, and priority support.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
Foundation models
| Field | Cursor | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Base models· | Models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, SpaceXAI and Cursor's own; named as written on the page “Choose between every cutting-edge model from OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, SpaceXAI, and Cursor.”cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “BYOK — bring your own OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, or self-hosted models.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Model provider· | “Choose between every cutting-edge model from OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, SpaceXAI, and Cursor.”cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “BYOK — bring your own OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, or self-hosted models.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Model swappable· | “BYOK — bring your own OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, or self-hosted models.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
Ecosystem
| Field | Cursor | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Protocols supported· | no public information qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 | |
| Tool use· | “type @ for tools & MCPs, / for skills and commands”cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “Qodo provides context-aware code suggestions that detect critical issues, logic gaps, enforce standards, and accelerate reviews with accurate, actionable insights.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Multi-agent· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “High-precision multi-agent code review across the SDLC, with full codebase context.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
Impact
| Field | Cursor | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| User base· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | Site displays three usage stat counters (900.1K / 646.5K / 12.8K, unlabeled in the capture), updated again from the prior 896.6K/644.3K/12.6K. “900.1K 646.5K 12.8K”qodo.ai · checked Sep 2, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Deployment scale· | “Trusted by over half of the Fortune 500 to accelerate development, securely and at scale.”cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | “Qodo is an AI code review and governance platform for engineering teams shipping at the speed AI writes code.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 7, 2026 |
| Target sectors· | no public information cursor.com · checked Aug 3, 2026 | Enterprise (SSO/SAML, BYOK, single-tenant/on-prem deployment, priority support) “Enterprise plans add SSO/SAML, BYOK, single-tenant or on-prem deployment, and priority support.”qodo.ai · checked Aug 18, 2026 |
Disclosed by neither
Both Cursor and Qodo publish nothing on these 24 fields. That is a finding about the category rather than a difference between them, so it is recorded here instead of as 24 identical table rows. Each is shown with its source check on the individual profiles.
- High-risk domains
- Documented incidents
- Supported regions
- Open weights
- Fine-tuning
- Context window
- API access
- Open source
- Marketplace presence
- Red teaming
- Usage restrictions
- Model or system card
- Incident reporting
- Insurance available
- Insurance carriers
- Coverage limits
- Indemnification
- Liability cap
- Tamper-evident log
- Regulatory alignment
- Outcome-based pricing
- Settlement mechanism
- Dispute process
- Evaluation coverage
Questions
- How do Cursor and Qodo compare on autonomy level?
- Cursor: full autonomy agentic version. Qodo: no public information disclosed.
- How do Cursor and Qodo compare on user base?
- Cursor: no public information disclosed. Qodo: Site displays three usage stat counters (900.1K / 646.5K / 12.8K, unlabeled in the capture), updated again from the prior 896.6K/644.3K/12.6K..
- How do Cursor and Qodo compare on target sectors?
- Cursor: no public information disclosed. Qodo: Enterprise (SSO/SAML, BYOK, single-tenant/on-prem deployment, priority support).
- How do Cursor and Qodo compare on price point?
- Cursor: no public information disclosed. Qodo: Credit packs on the Pro Team plan: 2,500 credits (~18 reviews/month), 5,000 (~36/month), 20,000 (~144/month), at $0.012 per credit..