agent · coding agent
AutonomyAI vs Claw Code
55 fields both were evaluated on, 27 of them different — including where one discloses something the other does not. Every value links to the document it came from. 28 further fields are disclosed by neither and are listed at the end rather than tabled.
Assurance
| Field | AutonomyAI | Claw Code |
|---|---|---|
| Audit trail· | “Full specs and change history for complete context”autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 | no public information claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
| Tamper-evident log· | no public information autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 | Vendor describes an independent append-only log system backing the agent; the same sentence states it was hidden from external builds in the original implementation, so customer reviewability is not established. “It is backed by an independent append-only log system, entirely hidden from external builds in the original implementation.”claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
| Explainability· | “Full specs and change history for complete context”autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 | no public information claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
| Runtime governance· | no public information autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 | “Each capability — file reading, Bash execution, web scraping, LSP integration, Git operations — is implemented as a self-contained tool with granular permission controls .”claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
| Permission scopes· | no public information autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 | “Each capability — file reading, Bash execution, web scraping, LSP integration, Git operations — is implemented as a self-contained tool with granular permission controls .”claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
| Compliance certifications· | “verified_user Compliance Security, governance, and regulatory documentation”autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 | no public information claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
| Regulatory alignment· | “verified_user Compliance Security, governance, and regulatory documentation”autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 | no public information claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
Agency
| Field | AutonomyAI | Claw Code |
|---|---|---|
| Human oversight· | “Your engineer clicks approve. Ships with one approval.”autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | no public information claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
| Goal complexity· | “One task request triggers up to 40+ internal agent steps.”autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 | no public information claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
| Action space· | Fei writes, renders, and validates the change and opens a PR; the engineer then clicks approve to ship. “Fei writes it, renders it, validates it, and opens a PR”autonomyai.io · checked Aug 26, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | “reads your entire codebase, edits files, executes commands, runs tests, handles Git”claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
| Operating environment· | ||
| Initiative· | “Fei Studio takes raw product ideas, whether from prompts, screenshots, or Figma, and turns them into codebase-aligned variants and testable implementation options before generating production-ready output.”autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 | no public information claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
Practicality
| Field | AutonomyAI | Claw Code |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model· | “Pricing is per-task - not per step, not per seat.”autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 | |
| Price point· | no public information autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 | |
| Availability· | no public information claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 | |
| Deployment options· | no public information claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 | |
| Integrations· | “Planned connectors to Amplitude, Mixpanel, and call recordings”autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 | “MCP Integration Full Model Context Protocol (MCP) support with 6 transport types — Stdio, SSE, HTTP, WebSocket, SDK, and ClaudeAiProxy.”claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
Foundation models
| Field | AutonomyAI | Claw Code |
|---|---|---|
| Base models· | no public information autonomyai.io · checked Aug 11, 2026 | “Provider-agnostic (Claude, OpenAI, local models)”claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
| Model provider· | no public information autonomyai.io · checked Aug 11, 2026 | “Provider-agnostic (Claude, OpenAI, local models)”claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
| Model swappable· | no public information autonomyai.io · checked Aug 11, 2026 | “Provider-agnostic (Claude, OpenAI, local models)”claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
| Open weights· | no public information autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
Ecosystem
| Field | AutonomyAI | Claw Code |
|---|---|---|
| Protocols supported· | Fei Studio (formerly Fei) works inside Claude Code, Cursor, or any MCP client “Claude Code, Cursor, or any MCP client”autonomyai.io · checked Aug 11, 2026 | “MCP Integration Full Model Context Protocol (MCP) support with 6 transport types — Stdio, SSE, HTTP, WebSocket, SDK, and ClaudeAiProxy.”claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
| Tool use· | “Fei Studio takes raw product ideas, whether from prompts, screenshots, or Figma, and turns them into codebase-aligned variants and testable implementation options before generating production-ready output.”autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 | no public information claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
| Multi-agent· | “One task request triggers up to 40+ internal agent steps.”autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 | “The framework supports spawning sub-agents — internally referred to as "swarms" — to parallelize complex tasks.”claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
| Open source· | no public information autonomyai.io · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
Impact
| Field | AutonomyAI | Claw Code |
|---|---|---|
| User base· | no public information claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 | |
| Deployment scale· | no public information claw-code.codes · checked Aug 6, 2026 |
Disclosed by neither
Both AutonomyAI and Claw Code publish nothing on these 28 fields. That is a finding about the category rather than a difference between them, so it is recorded here instead of as 28 identical table rows. Each is shown with its source check on the individual profiles.
- Autonomy level
- Target sectors
- High-risk domains
- Documented incidents
- Supported regions
- Support model
- Fine-tuning
- Context window
- API access
- Marketplace presence
- Safety evaluations
- Red teaming
- Safety policy
- Usage restrictions
- Model or system card
- Incident reporting
- Third-party evaluations
- Data handling
- Insurance available
- Insurance carriers
- Coverage limits
- Indemnification
- Liability cap
- Outcome-based pricing
- Settlement mechanism
- Dispute process
- SLA terms
- Evaluation coverage
Questions
- How do AutonomyAI and Claw Code compare on tamper-evident log?
- AutonomyAI: no public information disclosed. Claw Code: Vendor describes an independent append-only log system backing the agent; the same sentence states it was hidden from external builds in the original implementation, so customer reviewability is not established..