agent · ai security
Sectricity RedSOC Platform vs Superagent
55 fields both were evaluated on, 23 of them different — including where one discloses something the other does not. Every value links to the document it came from. 32 further fields are disclosed by neither and are listed at the end rather than tabled.
Assurance
| Field | Sectricity RedSOC Platform | Superagent |
|---|---|---|
| Audit trail· | yes — audit-grade reports with named tester, scope, methodology, findings, and remediation advice “Audit-Grade Rapportering Elke opdracht resulteert in een auditklaar rapport met benoemde lead tester, scope, methodologie, bevindingen en remediatieadvies.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | no public information superagent.sh · checked Aug 18, 2026 |
| Explainability· | yes — reports include methodology, findings, and rationale for remediation advice “Audit-Grade Rapportering Elke opdracht resulteert in een auditklaar rapport met benoemde lead tester, scope, methodologie, bevindingen en remediatieadvies.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | “findings on the exact line, fixes as pull requests.”superagent.sh · checked Aug 4, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Runtime governance· | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | runtime guardrails: deterministic rules that decide what your agent may do “runtime guardrails deterministic rules that decide what your agent may do.”superagent.sh · checked Aug 18, 2026 |
| SLA terms· | Average time from request to start stated as 1 day; presented as a performance average, not a contractual SLA. “1D Gemiddelde tijd van aanvraag tot start”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | no public information superagent.sh · checked Aug 4, 2026 |
| Evaluation coverage· | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | “self-serve red teaming against what you actually run.”superagent.sh · checked Aug 4, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
Agency
| Field | Sectricity RedSOC Platform | Superagent |
|---|---|---|
| Human oversight· | human validation is always performed by ethical hackers; AI framework accelerates context building but does not replace human oversight “Onze hackers verifiëren wat in je concrete omgeving uitbuitbaar is, filteren false positives en geven aan wat eerst moet worden opgelost. Onze hackers werken met ons eigen AI research framework om sneller context te bouwen, maar de validatie is altijd menselijk.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | no public information superagent.sh · checked Aug 4, 2026 |
| Goal complexity· | multi-step (finding chained logic flaws, manipulating payment flows, identifying multiple interdependent vulnerabilities) “Onze hackers vinden broken authorization, IDOR, race conditions, manipulatie van betaalflows en chained logic flaws die geen tool detecteert.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | no public information superagent.sh · checked Aug 4, 2026 |
| Initiative· | can self-initiate upon triggering events (new asset, feature, change, scanner finding) “Start een menselijke security test zodra een nieuwe asset, feature of wijziging live gaat.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | no public information superagent.sh · checked Aug 4, 2026 |
Safety
| Field | Sectricity RedSOC Platform | Superagent |
|---|---|---|
| Safety evaluations· | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | “self-serve red teaming against what you actually run.”superagent.sh · checked Aug 4, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Red teaming· | yes — red teaming is a core service offering, implying internal adversarial testing “Social Engineering en Red Team Het menselijke aanvalsoppervlak is onzichtbaar voor scanners. Phishing, vishing, fysieke intrusie, volledige red team scenario's met assumed breach.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | “self-serve red teaming against what you actually run.”superagent.sh · checked Aug 4, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
Practicality
| Field | Sectricity RedSOC Platform | Superagent |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model· | usage-based (credits per test) “RedSOC werkt met een transparant creditmodel: je betaalt alleen voor wat je gebruikt, zonder vaste jaarcontracten.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | no public information superagent.sh · checked Aug 4, 2026 |
| Price point· | customized per environment (no fixed public price, but transparent credit model after intake) “Na een korte intake weet je exact hoeveel credits een test kost voor jouw omgeving.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | no public information superagent.sh · checked Aug 4, 2026 |
| Availability· | GA (general availability — active engagements, on-demand console, demo available) “Demo Aanvragen RedSOC On-Demand Console Lopende Engagements ACTIEF”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | no public information superagent.sh · checked Aug 4, 2026 |
| Deployment options· | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | “you already work in your coding agent and github. so that's where superagent works too — no new workflows or tools to learn.”superagent.sh · checked Aug 4, 2026 |
| Integrations· | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
Foundation models
| Field | Sectricity RedSOC Platform | Superagent |
|---|---|---|
| Base models· | proprietary AI research framework (no specific model named) “versneld door ons AI research framework”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | no public information superagent.sh · checked Aug 4, 2026 |
Ecosystem
| Field | Sectricity RedSOC Platform | Superagent |
|---|---|---|
| Protocols supported· | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | Ships MCP-related capability: a "contributor trust" API and MCP integration (per product changelog, 2026-08-11). “contributor trust api and mcp”superagent.sh · checked Aug 18, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Tool use· | uses internal AI framework to build context faster (tool use for research acceleration) “Onze hackers werken met ons eigen AI research framework om sneller context te bouwen”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | Deterministic runtime rules govern what agents may do; sensitive activity is confined to the endpoint “control it where it runs deterministic rules for what agents do, trust scores for everything they consume — and sensitive activity stays on the endpoint.”superagent.sh · checked Aug 18, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| API access· | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | Contributor Trust API and MCP integration shipped per product changelog (2026-08-11); no separate REST/webhooks API documented on current homepage. “contributor trust api and mcp”superagent.sh · checked Aug 18, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Open source· | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
Impact
| Field | Sectricity RedSOC Platform | Superagent |
|---|---|---|
| User base· | at least 12 active or validated engagements this quarter (3 in progress + 7 validated + 2 in triage) “ACTIEF 3 Tests in uitvoering 7 Gevalideerd dit kwartaal 2 In triage”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | ubicloud, evry health, dotenvx, firecrawl, capchase, nango, mastra, paperclip “ubicloud evry health dotenvx firecrawl capchase nango mastra paperclip”superagent.sh · checked Aug 4, 2026 |
| Deployment scale· | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | “free for open source. the whole suite, on any public repo. private repos are paid — contact us and we'll set you up.”superagent.sh · checked Aug 4, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 16, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Target sectors· | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
Disclosed by neither
Both Sectricity RedSOC Platform and Superagent publish nothing on these 32 fields. That is a finding about the category rather than a difference between them, so it is recorded here instead of as 32 identical table rows. Each is shown with its source check on the individual profiles.
- Autonomy level
- Action space
- Operating environment
- High-risk domains
- Documented incidents
- Supported regions
- Support model
- Model provider
- Model swappable
- Open weights
- Fine-tuning
- Context window
- Multi-agent
- Marketplace presence
- Safety policy
- Usage restrictions
- Model or system card
- Incident reporting
- Third-party evaluations
- Data handling
- Insurance available
- Insurance carriers
- Coverage limits
- Indemnification
- Liability cap
- Tamper-evident log
- Permission scopes
- Compliance certifications
- Regulatory alignment
- Outcome-based pricing
- Settlement mechanism
- Dispute process
Questions
- How do Sectricity RedSOC Platform and Superagent compare on human oversight?
- Sectricity RedSOC Platform: human validation is always performed by ethical hackers; AI framework accelerates context building but does not replace human oversight. Superagent: no public information disclosed.
- How do Sectricity RedSOC Platform and Superagent compare on goal complexity?
- Sectricity RedSOC Platform: multi-step (finding chained logic flaws, manipulating payment flows, identifying multiple interdependent vulnerabilities). Superagent: no public information disclosed.
- How do Sectricity RedSOC Platform and Superagent compare on initiative?
- Sectricity RedSOC Platform: can self-initiate upon triggering events (new asset, feature, change, scanner finding). Superagent: no public information disclosed.
- How do Sectricity RedSOC Platform and Superagent compare on user base?
- Sectricity RedSOC Platform: at least 12 active or validated engagements this quarter (3 in progress + 7 validated + 2 in triage). Superagent: ubicloud, evry health, dotenvx, firecrawl, capchase, nango, mastra, paperclip.
- How do Sectricity RedSOC Platform and Superagent compare on pricing model?
- Sectricity RedSOC Platform: usage-based (credits per test). Superagent: no public information disclosed.
- How do Sectricity RedSOC Platform and Superagent compare on price point?
- Sectricity RedSOC Platform: customized per environment (no fixed public price, but transparent credit model after intake). Superagent: no public information disclosed.