Firecrawl vs TranscriptFetch
59 fields both were evaluated on, 16 of them different — including where one discloses something the other does not. Every value links to the document it came from. 43 further fields are disclosed by neither and are listed at the end rather than tabled.
Assurance
| Field | Firecrawl | TranscriptFetch |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome-based pricing· | no public information www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 9, 2026 | Billing is per successful response only; failed or empty responses are not charged “Only successful responses are billed, and unused credits roll over.”transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 21, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 11, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| SLA terms· | no public information www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 9, 2026 | 99.79% API uptime, per the vendor's own homepage. An 2026-08-14 capture of the same page read 99.71%; this is a live-looking figure that moves between captures. “99.79% API uptime”transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 21, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 11, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Self-reported performance· | Reports P95 latency of 3.4s across millions of searches/scrapes “P95 latency of 3.4s across millions of searches and scrapes, built for real-time agents and dynamic apps.”www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 26, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 17, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | Vendor states platform captions cover 54% of short-form videos and that transcribing the audio raises coverage to 96% of the same videos. “Only 54% of short-form videos carry a usable caption track. When captions are missing, TranscriptFetch transcribes the audio instead, so it returns timestamped text for 96% of the same videos.”transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 21, 2026 |
Safety
| Field | Firecrawl | TranscriptFetch |
|---|---|---|
| Incident reporting· | “If a charge looks incorrect, reach out to help@firecrawl.com and we'll take a look.”www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 9, 2026 | no public information transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 14, 2026 |
Practicality
| Field | Firecrawl | TranscriptFetch |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model· | “We currently do not offer a pay-per-use plan, instead you can upgrade to our Hobby, Standard or Growth plans for more credits and higher rate limits.”www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 9, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 17, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | Monthly credit-based subscription tiers; only successful responses consume credits and unused credits roll over “Only successful responses are billed, and unused credits roll over.”transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 14, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 11, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Price point· | “Firecrawl is free for 1,000 pages every month (1,000 free credits per month).”www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 9, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 17, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | $5/mo for 500 credits, $15/mo for 5,000 credits, $45/mo for 50,000 credits; 100 free credits/month with no card required “Basic For side projects and light pipelines. $5 /mo 500 credits every month”transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 21, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 11, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Availability· | “Agent is in preview with 5 free daily runs and dynamic pricing.”www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 9, 2026 | no public information transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 14, 2026 |
| Integrations· | “Firecrawl has an official MCP server so agents in Cursor, Claude, Windsurf, and other MCP-compatible tools can search, scrape, and interact with the web directly.”www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 9, 2026 | Integrates with n8n, Make, Zapier, Cursor, VS Code, Claude and ChatGPT “Plug into the tools you already use”transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 14, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 11, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Support model· | no public information www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 9, 2026 | Email support on Pro, priority support on Mega; states a real person answers rather than a ticket queue “A real person answers. No ticket queue.”transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 14, 2026 |
Ecosystem
| Field | Firecrawl | TranscriptFetch |
|---|---|---|
| Protocols supported· | no public information www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 9, 2026 | Hosted MCP server plus a prebuilt n8n node; reachable from Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or VS Code. The Make and Zapier steps named in the 2026-08-14 capture are no longer on the page. “A hosted MCP server plus a prebuilt n8n node”transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 21, 2026 |
| Tool use· | “Interact: Click, navigate, operate pages”www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 9, 2026 | no public information transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 14, 2026 |
| API access· | “Firecrawl is the context API to search, scrape, and interact with the web at scale.”www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 9, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 17, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | Public API; the vendor issues API keys, with 100 free credits monthly and no card required. “100 free credits every month, no card, no sales call. Failed fetches are never billed. Get an API key”transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 14, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 11, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
| Open source· | “Firecrawl is the largest open source repo in the space with over 150K GitHub stars, making it one of the top 100 repos on GitHub.”www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 9, 2026 | no public information transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 14, 2026 |
Impact
| Field | Firecrawl | TranscriptFetch |
|---|---|---|
| User base· | “Over 1.25M developers and 150,000+ companies build with Firecrawl”www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 9, 2026 | no public information transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 14, 2026 |
| Deployment scale· | “We've served more than 5 billion requests powering deep research agents, RAG pipelines, lead enrichment, and AI workflows across the live web.”www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 9, 2026 | Vendor reports processing 1.2 million public video URLs in the trailing 90 days “1.2M public video URLs, last 90 days”transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 21, 2026 |
| Target sectors· | “Teams use Firecrawl for deep research agents, RAG pipelines, lead enrichment, competitive intelligence, content generation, price monitoring, and more.”www.firecrawl.dev · checked Aug 9, 2026 | Pro tier positioned for production apps, agents, and RAG pipelines “For production apps, agents, and RAG pipelines.”transcriptfetch.com · checked Aug 14, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 11, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations |
Disclosed by neither
Both Firecrawl and TranscriptFetch publish nothing on these 43 fields. That is a finding about the category rather than a difference between them, so it is recorded here instead of as 43 identical table rows. Each is shown with its source check on the individual profiles.
- Autonomy level
- Human oversight
- Goal complexity
- Action space
- Operating environment
- Initiative
- High-risk domains
- Documented incidents
- Market recognition
- Deployment options
- Supported regions
- Base models
- Model provider
- Model swappable
- Open weights
- Fine-tuning
- Context window
- Multi-agent
- Marketplace presence
- Safety evaluations
- Red teaming
- Safety policy
- Usage restrictions
- Model or system card
- Third-party evaluations
- Data handling
- Insurance available
- Own liability cover
- Insurance carriers
- Coverage limits
- Indemnification
- Liability cap
- Audit trail
- Tamper-evident log
- Explainability
- Runtime governance
- Permission scopes
- Compliance certifications
- Regulatory alignment
- Settlement mechanism
- Asset custody
- Dispute process
- Evaluation coverage
Questions
- How do Firecrawl and TranscriptFetch compare on support model?
- Firecrawl: no public information disclosed. TranscriptFetch: Email support on Pro, priority support on Mega; states a real person answers rather than a ticket queue.
- How do Firecrawl and TranscriptFetch compare on protocols supported?
- Firecrawl: no public information disclosed. TranscriptFetch: Hosted MCP server plus a prebuilt n8n node; reachable from Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or VS Code. The Make and Zapier steps named in the 2026-08-14 capture are no longer on the page..
- How do Firecrawl and TranscriptFetch compare on outcome-based pricing?
- Firecrawl: no public information disclosed. TranscriptFetch: Billing is per successful response only; failed or empty responses are not charged.
- How do Firecrawl and TranscriptFetch compare on sla terms?
- Firecrawl: no public information disclosed. TranscriptFetch: 99.79% API uptime, per the vendor's own homepage. An 2026-08-14 capture of the same page read 99.71%; this is a live-looking figure that moves between captures..
- How do Firecrawl and TranscriptFetch compare on self-reported performance?
- Firecrawl: Reports P95 latency of 3.4s across millions of searches/scrapes. TranscriptFetch: Vendor states platform captions cover 54% of short-form videos and that transcribing the audio raises coverage to 96% of the same videos..