Augment Code vs Warp AI
55 fields both were evaluated on, 34 of them different — including where one discloses something the other does not. Every value links to the document it came from. 21 further fields are disclosed by neither and are listed at the end rather than tabled.
Assurance
| Field | Augment Code | Warp AI |
|---|---|---|
| Audit trail· | no public information augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | Each agent run captures a screenshot or video recording, giving a reviewable record before a PR ships. “every factory agent captures a screenshot or video so you can verify its work before shipping a PR.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Explainability· | “CI Failure Investigator ★ Triggered on any failed GitHub Actions run — reads the log, identifies the root-cause step, and posts a plain-English diagnosis as a PR comment with a suggested fix.”augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | A worked example shows the agent narrating a root-cause fix and opening a PR, illustrating that its actions come with a stated rationale rather than being opaque. “Found it — the testimonials section was hidden by collapsing divs. Patched, PR #436 is up for review.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Runtime governance· | “Checkpoints are first-class. Loops pause for review, resume on reply, and consequential actions are approved by a person.”augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 17, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | Positions itself around giving customers continuous governance and security controls over their coding agents by default. “Control your coding agent chaos continuous improvement, better governance and security, by default.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Permission scopes· | no public information augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | Access controls are centrally configured and centrally managed at the org level. “Run agents confidently with guardrails in place, centrally configured agent access, and centrally managed permissions.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Evaluation coverage· | no public information augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | States that evaluation and benchmarking are built-in, core features rather than an add-on. “evals, benchmarks, and self-improvement built in.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
Agency
| Field | Augment Code | Warp AI |
|---|---|---|
| Autonomy level· | no public information augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | States most organizations start with 20-30% of pull requests fully automated, rising over time as the system self-improves — i.e. partial rather than full autonomy initially. “most orgs start around 20-30% of PRs fully automated, starting with simple tasks. over time this goes up as models improve and your factory self-improves.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Human oversight· | “Checkpoints are first-class. Loops pause for review, resume on reply, and consequential actions are approved by a person.”augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 17, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | Lets a human watch, steer, or take over an agent run from any surface (web, mobile, terminal, or IDE). “any surface watch, steer, and hand off runs from web, mobile, terminal, or IDE.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Goal complexity· | “agents carry the repetitive middle of the SDLC, humans decide at the checkpoints, and every run sharpens the next.”augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 17, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | Positions its scope broadly as automating the entire software development lifecycle, beyond just CI/CD, at scale. “Beyond CI/CD to automating the whole SDLC defined in code, built for scale, and easy to deploy.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Action space· | “Execute Code · Review · Triage”augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 17, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | Agents are triggered by an issue, chat message or schedule and carry work through triage, review, and up to a mergeable pull request. “a fleet of agents wired to your SDLC — triggered by an issue, a slack message, or a schedule, and coordinated by warp factories from triage through review to a mergeable PR.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Operating environment· | “Cosmos runs your software agents at scale, giving them the context, tools, and feedback loops they need to get better with every workflow.”augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | Marketed as an agentic development platform meant to work across wherever and however a developer works. “Warp is an open agentic development platform that was built to work wherever and however you work.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Initiative· | “Standing loops across every team. Always running, always sharing, always improving.”augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 17, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | Agents proactively pull a human back in mid-run when they get stuck, rather than only waiting to be asked. “the factory agents loop you in proactively when they need help.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
Safety
| Field | Augment Code | Warp AI |
|---|---|---|
| Safety policy· | no public information augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | Advertises guardrails, centralized agent-access configuration, and centrally managed permissions as enterprise controls. “Run agents confidently with guardrails in place, centrally configured agent access, and centrally managed permissions.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Model or system card· | no public information warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 | |
| Incident reporting· | no public information warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 | |
| Data handling· | no public information augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | Data can be stored in Warp's cloud or fully self-hosted in the customer's own VPC, under the customer's existing retention/compliance rules. “wherever you choose — warp's cloud, or fully self-hosted inside your own VPC, under your existing retention and compliance rules.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
Practicality
| Field | Augment Code | Warp AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model· | no public information augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | Priced on a usage basis per agent run, with $10k of free usage offered to qualifying orgs during closed early access. “usage-based, priced per agent run. qualifying orgs get $10k of factory usage during closed early access.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Price point· | no public information augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | Offers up to $10,000 of free usage credit for qualifying organizations during early access. “get up to $10,000 in free factory usage”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Availability· | no public information warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 | |
| Deployment options· | “Managed cloud sandboxes, your own machines for code that cannot leave the building, or pools of both.”augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | Runs either on Warp's own hosted cloud or fully self-hosted inside the customer's own VPC. “warp cloud self-hosted warp's cloud, or self-hosted in your own VPC.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Integrations· | “Native triggers for GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear, Jira, schedules, and typed webhooks for the rest of your stack.”augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | Work enters the system from chat apps, ticketing tools and source control, with status reported back to the same origin. “integrations work flows in from chat, tickets, and source control; status flows back to where it started.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
Foundation models
| Field | Augment Code | Warp AI |
|---|---|---|
| Base models· | Its own benchmark table names specific models it runs and compares, including Claude Fable 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, and Gemini 3.6 Flash. “best 1.00x Claude Fable 5 pass 1.00x $0.53 GPT-5.6 Sol pass 0.94x $0.41 Gemini 3.6 Flash fail 0.89x $0.32”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 | |
| Model provider· | Is provider-agnostic: customers bring their own model or coding harness rather than being locked to one model vendor. “bring your own model or harness (e.g. claude code or codex) — warp factories works with whatever your team prefers”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 | |
| Model swappable· | no public information augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | Model choice is not locked in — customers can bring their own model or harness rather than being tied to one. “bring your own model or harness (e.g. claude code or codex) — warp factories works with whatever your team prefers”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Open weights· | no public information augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | Supports open-weight models as an option alongside frontier models, selectable per pipeline stage. “frontier open-weight frontier or open-weight, chosen per pipeline stage.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Fine-tuning· | “Improve the prompt once; every future run upgrades.”augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | no public information warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Context window· | no public information warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
Ecosystem
| Field | Augment Code | Warp AI |
|---|---|---|
| Protocols supported· | Exposes itself as a platform via API, CLI, SDK and MCP rather than a single vertical product. “API, CLI, SDK and MCP built as a platform, not a vertical product or AI teammate.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 | |
| Tool use· | “Cosmos runs your software agents at scale, giving them the context, tools, and feedback loops they need to get better with every workflow.”augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | Work is invoked through its API, CLI, SDK and MCP surfaces. “API, CLI, SDK and MCP built as a platform, not a vertical product or AI teammate.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Multi-agent· | “Loops hand outcomes to each other: triage feeds authoring, authoring feeds review, postmortems file the next tickets.”augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | A single customer example config is applied across as many as 112 agents at once, indicating multi-agent orchestration at scale. “factory.yaml applied to all 112 agents”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| API access· | no public information augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | Exposes programmatic access as part of an API, CLI, SDK and MCP platform surface. “API, CLI, SDK and MCP built as a platform, not a vertical product or AI teammate.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| Open source· | no public information augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | Its terminal product is open source. “An open-source terminal built for AI-assisted software development.”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
Impact
| Field | Augment Code | Warp AI |
|---|---|---|
| User base· | Claims over 800,000 developers and thousands of engineering teams as users. “Trusted by over 800,000 developers and thousands of engineering teams at leading companies”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 | |
| Deployment scale· | “Cosmos is the platform built for the second.”augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 Not in our latest capture. We captured this page again on Sep 17, 2026 and this quote was not there. How we re-check citations | Claims 800,000+ developers as its adoption-scale headline. “trusted by 800k+ devs at SDLC coverage”warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
| High-risk domains· | “Security Remediation From CVE alert to a reviewed fix”augmentcode.com · checked Aug 6, 2026 | no public information warp.dev · checked Sep 10, 2026 |
Disclosed by neither
Both Augment Code and Warp AI publish nothing on these 21 fields. That is a finding about the category rather than a difference between them, so it is recorded here instead of as 21 identical table rows. Each is shown with its source check on the individual profiles.
- Target sectors
- Documented incidents
- Supported regions
- Support model
- Marketplace presence
- Safety evaluations
- Red teaming
- Usage restrictions
- Third-party evaluations
- Insurance available
- Insurance carriers
- Coverage limits
- Indemnification
- Liability cap
- Tamper-evident log
- Compliance certifications
- Regulatory alignment
- Outcome-based pricing
- Settlement mechanism
- Dispute process
- SLA terms
Questions
- How do Augment Code and Warp AI compare on autonomy level?
- Augment Code: no public information disclosed. Warp AI: States most organizations start with 20-30% of pull requests fully automated, rising over time as the system self-improves — i.e. partial rather than full autonomy initially..
- How do Augment Code and Warp AI compare on pricing model?
- Augment Code: no public information disclosed. Warp AI: Priced on a usage basis per agent run, with $10k of free usage offered to qualifying orgs during closed early access..
- How do Augment Code and Warp AI compare on price point?
- Augment Code: no public information disclosed. Warp AI: Offers up to $10,000 of free usage credit for qualifying organizations during early access..
- How do Augment Code and Warp AI compare on model swappable?
- Augment Code: no public information disclosed. Warp AI: Model choice is not locked in — customers can bring their own model or harness rather than being tied to one..
- How do Augment Code and Warp AI compare on open weights?
- Augment Code: no public information disclosed. Warp AI: Supports open-weight models as an option alongside frontier models, selectable per pipeline stage..
- How do Augment Code and Warp AI compare on api access?
- Augment Code: no public information disclosed. Warp AI: Exposes programmatic access as part of an API, CLI, SDK and MCP platform surface..