agent · ai security
7AI vs Sectricity RedSOC Platform
55 fields both were evaluated on, 19 of them different — including where one discloses something the other does not. Every value links to the document it came from. 36 further fields are disclosed by neither and are listed at the end rather than tabled.
Assurance
| Field | 7AI | Sectricity RedSOC Platform |
|---|---|---|
| Audit trail· | no public information 7ai.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | yes — audit-grade reports with named tester, scope, methodology, findings, and remediation advice “Audit-Grade Rapportering Elke opdracht resulteert in een auditklaar rapport met benoemde lead tester, scope, methodologie, bevindingen en remediatieadvies.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Explainability· | no public information 7ai.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | yes — reports include methodology, findings, and rationale for remediation advice “Audit-Grade Rapportering Elke opdracht resulteert in een auditklaar rapport met benoemde lead tester, scope, methodologie, bevindingen en remediatieadvies.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Outcome-based pricing· | “Delivered as Service as Software — you get outcomes, not another login”7ai.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| SLA terms· | no public information 7ai.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | Average time from request to start stated as 1 day; presented as a performance average, not a contractual SLA. “1D Gemiddelde tijd van aanvraag tot start”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
Agency
| Field | 7AI | Sectricity RedSOC Platform |
|---|---|---|
| Human oversight· | no public information 7ai.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | human validation is always performed by ethical hackers; AI framework accelerates context building but does not replace human oversight “Onze hackers verifiëren wat in je concrete omgeving uitbuitbaar is, filteren false positives en geven aan wat eerst moet worden opgelost. Onze hackers werken met ons eigen AI research framework om sneller context te bouwen, maar de validatie is altijd menselijk.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Goal complexity· | no public information 7ai.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | multi-step (finding chained logic flaws, manipulating payment flows, identifying multiple interdependent vulnerabilities) “Onze hackers vinden broken authorization, IDOR, race conditions, manipulatie van betaalflows en chained logic flaws die geen tool detecteert.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Initiative· | no public information 7ai.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | can self-initiate upon triggering events (new asset, feature, change, scanner finding) “Start een menselijke security test zodra een nieuwe asset, feature of wijziging live gaat.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
Safety
| Field | 7AI | Sectricity RedSOC Platform |
|---|---|---|
| Red teaming· | no public information 7ai.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | yes — red teaming is a core service offering, implying internal adversarial testing “Social Engineering en Red Team Het menselijke aanvalsoppervlak is onzichtbaar voor scanners. Phishing, vishing, fysieke intrusie, volledige red team scenario's met assumed breach.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
Practicality
| Field | 7AI | Sectricity RedSOC Platform |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model· | no public information 7ai.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | usage-based (credits per test) “RedSOC werkt met een transparant creditmodel: je betaalt alleen voor wat je gebruikt, zonder vaste jaarcontracten.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Price point· | no public information 7ai.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | customized per environment (no fixed public price, but transparent credit model after intake) “Na een korte intake weet je exact hoeveel credits een test kost voor jouw omgeving.”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Availability· | no public information 7ai.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | GA (general availability — active engagements, on-demand console, demo available) “Demo Aanvragen RedSOC On-Demand Console Lopende Engagements ACTIEF”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Deployment options· | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | |
| Integrations· | “Shaped to fit your existing tools, workflows, and appetite for risk”7ai.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
Foundation models
| Field | 7AI | Sectricity RedSOC Platform |
|---|---|---|
| Base models· | no public information 7ai.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | proprietary AI research framework (no specific model named) “versneld door ons AI research framework”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
Ecosystem
| Field | 7AI | Sectricity RedSOC Platform |
|---|---|---|
| Tool use· | no public information 7ai.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | uses internal AI framework to build context faster (tool use for research acceleration) “Onze hackers werken met ons eigen AI research framework om sneller context te bouwen”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
Impact
| Field | 7AI | Sectricity RedSOC Platform |
|---|---|---|
| User base· | at least 12 active or validated engagements this quarter (3 in progress + 7 validated + 2 in triage) “ACTIEF 3 Tests in uitvoering 7 Gevalideerd dit kwartaal 2 In triage”sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | |
| Deployment scale· | “We believe this is the world’s largest, most successful AI SOC deployment.”7ai.com · checked Aug 2, 2026 | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
| Target sectors· | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 | |
| High-risk domains· | no public information sectricity.com · checked Aug 1, 2026 |
Disclosed by neither
Both 7AI and Sectricity RedSOC Platform publish nothing on these 36 fields. That is a finding about the category rather than a difference between them, so it is recorded here instead of as 36 identical table rows. Each is shown with its source check on the individual profiles.
- Autonomy level
- Action space
- Operating environment
- Documented incidents
- Supported regions
- Support model
- Model provider
- Model swappable
- Open weights
- Fine-tuning
- Context window
- Protocols supported
- Multi-agent
- API access
- Open source
- Marketplace presence
- Safety evaluations
- Safety policy
- Usage restrictions
- Model or system card
- Incident reporting
- Third-party evaluations
- Data handling
- Insurance available
- Insurance carriers
- Coverage limits
- Indemnification
- Liability cap
- Tamper-evident log
- Runtime governance
- Permission scopes
- Compliance certifications
- Regulatory alignment
- Settlement mechanism
- Dispute process
- Evaluation coverage
Questions
- How do 7AI and Sectricity RedSOC Platform compare on human oversight?
- 7AI: no public information disclosed. Sectricity RedSOC Platform: human validation is always performed by ethical hackers; AI framework accelerates context building but does not replace human oversight.
- How do 7AI and Sectricity RedSOC Platform compare on goal complexity?
- 7AI: no public information disclosed. Sectricity RedSOC Platform: multi-step (finding chained logic flaws, manipulating payment flows, identifying multiple interdependent vulnerabilities).
- How do 7AI and Sectricity RedSOC Platform compare on initiative?
- 7AI: no public information disclosed. Sectricity RedSOC Platform: can self-initiate upon triggering events (new asset, feature, change, scanner finding).
- How do 7AI and Sectricity RedSOC Platform compare on pricing model?
- 7AI: no public information disclosed. Sectricity RedSOC Platform: usage-based (credits per test).
- How do 7AI and Sectricity RedSOC Platform compare on price point?
- 7AI: no public information disclosed. Sectricity RedSOC Platform: customized per environment (no fixed public price, but transparent credit model after intake).
- How do 7AI and Sectricity RedSOC Platform compare on availability?
- 7AI: no public information disclosed. Sectricity RedSOC Platform: GA (general availability — active engagements, on-demand console, demo available).