Web-browsing agent Browser Use claims 98% accuracy in its own published benchmark; no third-party evaluation, compliance certification or insurance disclosed

Browser Use, an open web-automation framework that lets AI agents control a browser, advertises a 98% accuracy figure and top billing among competing agents on its own site — a benchmark the company ran and published itself, according to a review of browser-use.com by AI Dispatch. No independent evaluation of the claim appears on the same page.

"The most accurate web agent. And the cheapest," the company's homepage states. Its published benchmark backs the first half of that claim: "Benchmarks Performance results accuracy 98%," according to the site. AI Dispatch's index records no third-party evaluation of either figure.

The pricing claim is more specific and checks against a published rate. Browser Use prices its hosted browser infrastructure by usage — "token priced," the company states — and names a rate for the underlying browser: "$0.02 / hour," according to the site, plus internet traffic. The company also reports scale: "Downloads a month 8.5M," a self-reported figure with no independent traffic verification cited.

Outside pricing and its own benchmark, Browser Use's site is largely silent on the dimensions AI Dispatch's index tracks. No audit trail, compliance certification, insurance product, liability cap or runtime governance control appears on the page reviewed. AI Dispatch's index records all five as "no public information."

That leaves a widely downloaded agent framework — one capable of taking actions inside a browser on a user's behalf — making a performance claim it has not had verified by anyone outside the company, while disclosing none of the governance or liability terms that would apply if that browsing went wrong.

AI Dispatch's full index and sourcing are published at aidispatch.news, with a source URL, retrieval timestamp and quote attached to every field.