Orloj
25 fields evidenced · 30 with no public information. Every value below links to the document it came from and the date we checked it.
25 of them are quoted but not yet interpreted: we hold the source sentence and the date we read it, but nobody has written the answer to the question yet. Those rows show the quote and say so rather than repeating it back as an answer. Why these exist
4 of those are flagged for review: our own check found language in the cited source that may address the field. An editor has not adjudicated them yet.
1 absence has been read back against the source by an editor and confirmed.
Also appears in
Trust gap
How this is scoredThese scores are automated. A 1 or 2 counts how many fields this entry answers with a citation — not what those answers say. A 0 means every field for that dimension is recorded as undisclosed and none of the pages we captured mentions it. No one has scored this entry against the rubric yet.
Are scope, spend, and authority enforced while the agent runs?
Scored from 1 evidenced field(s): runtime_governance. Automated score; capped at 2 pending review.
Counts Runtime governance, each cited below.
This score counts Permission scopes as undisclosed, and that absence is flagged for review — the cited source may address it. If so, this score is too low. How we check absences
Is there a tamper-evident record of what it actually did?
Scored from 1 evidenced field(s): audit_trail. Automated score; capped at 2 pending review.
Counts Audit trail, each cited below.
Are compliance obligations attached per engagement?
Scored from 2 evidenced field(s): compliance_certs, regulatory_alignment. Automated score; capped at 2 pending review.
Counts Compliance certifications and Regulatory alignment, each cited below.
Does payment depend on a verified result?
Can the deployment be insured, and is the customer indemnified?
Assurance
- Insurance available
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Insurance carriers
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Coverage limits
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · absence verified against this source
- Indemnification
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Liability cap
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Audit trail
“Full task trace and message lifecycle logging”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Tamper-evident log
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Explainability
“Fail-closed governance at the execution layer”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Runtime governance
“Governance is enforced at the execution layer”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Permission scopes
- no public information
Flagged for review — the source below contains language that may address this field. Not yet checked by an editor. How we check absences
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 - Compliance certifications
“The structured audit trail is designed to support compliance workflows for frameworks like HIPAA, SOC 2, and the EU AI Act.”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Regulatory alignment
“The structured audit trail is designed to support compliance workflows for frameworks like HIPAA, SOC 2, and the EU AI Act.”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Outcome-based pricing
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Settlement mechanism
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Dispute process
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- SLA terms
“Custom SLAs and uptime guarantees”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Evaluation coverage
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
Agency
- Autonomy level
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Human oversight
“Governance is enforced at the execution layer”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Goal complexity
“Declarative YAML graphs with fan-out and join gates”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Action space
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Operating environment
“Tool Runtime sandboxed, container, WASM”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Initiative
“Orloj schedules, executes, and governs them”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026
Safety
- Safety evaluations
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Red teaming
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Safety policy
“Fail-closed governance at the execution layer”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Usage restrictions
“blocked_tools: - filesystem_delete”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Model or system card
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Incident reporting
“Full task trace and message lifecycle logging”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Third-party evaluations
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Data handling
“Full task trace and message lifecycle logging”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026
Practicality
- Pricing model
- no public information
Flagged for review — the source below contains language that may address this field. Not yet checked by an editor. How we check absences
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 - Price point
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Availability
“Orloj v0.19.0 is live.”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Deployment options
- no public information
Flagged for review — the source below contains language that may address this field. Not yet checked by an editor. How we check absences
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 - Integrations
“MCP tool integration”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Supported regions
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Support model
- no public information
Flagged for review — the source below contains language that may address this field. Not yet checked by an editor. How we check absences
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026
Foundation models
- Base models
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Model provider
“Model Gateway OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Model swappable
“model_ref: openai-default”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Open weights
“Orloj is Apache 2.0 licensed and developed publicly on GitHub.”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Fine-tuning
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Context window
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
Ecosystem
- Protocols supported
“MCP tool integration”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Tool use
“Agents call tools they should not touch. Tool permissions enforced at execution time.”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Multi-agent
“Orloj is an open-source orchestration runtime for multi-agent AI systems.”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- API access
“Server orlojd API Server REST, watch, web console”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Open source
“Orloj is Apache 2.0 licensed”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Marketplace presence
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
Impact
- User base
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Deployment scale
“Deploy on your own infrastructure with no limits. Unlimited agents and workflows”
orloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026- Target sectors
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- High-risk domains
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this
- Documented incidents
- no public informationorloj.dev · checked Aug 1, 2026 · source did not state this