Litrevu

Are scope, spend, and authority enforced while the agent runs?

Output volume is bounded at run time by a purchased word quota (Starter $8.49/7,500 words; Scholar $29.99/50,000; Platinum $99.99/250,000), which is a spend/scope cap. No enforcement of authority, tool scope or action limits is published.

Counts Price point, each cited below.

Is there a tamper-evident record of what it actually did?

Output provenance is customer-reviewable: the vendor states every citation traces back to a PDF the user uploaded. This is per-output traceability, not a tamper-evident or hash-chained record of the agent's own actions, and no retention or export of such a record is published.

Counts Explainability, each cited below.

Are compliance obligations attached per engagement?

No public evidence found. The vendor publishes no compliance posture, certification or audit schedule; its usage note defers the question to the customer ("Always check your institution's AI policy before submitting"), which places the obligation on the user rather than publishing a posture of its own.

Does payment depend on a verified result?

A 30-day money-back guarantee is published, and plans are a one-time purchase rather than a subscription. That is a blanket refund window, not payment released against a verified outcome; the fee is owed regardless of whether the literature review is usable.

Counts Dispute process, each cited below.

Can the deployment be insured, and is the customer indemnified?

No public evidence found. No carrier, cover, liability cap or customer indemnity is named anywhere on the page checked.