Jity AI

Are scope, spend, and authority enforced while the agent runs?

One real but thin control. The page documents an optional review mode, enabled during campaign setup, that holds each post for human preview and approval before it goes live - a genuine constraint on the agent's most consequential action, publishing. It is scored 1 rather than 2 because it is opt-in and off by default: the same answer continues "Otherwise, I will publish directly based on your setup." Beyond that gate the capture publishes no enforced limit on scope, spend or authority at run time - no channel restriction, no spend cap, no rate limit, and no permission scopes. permission_scopes and runtime_governance are both recorded as no public information.

Counts Human oversight, each cited below. Also named Runtime governance and Permission scopes, which our record now shows as undisclosed; that part of the support no longer holds. What a score rests on

Is there a tamper-evident record of what it actually did?

No record of any kind is published. The 5,905-character capture contains nothing about activity logs, run history, session replay, export of what the agent did, or customer review of its actions, and no tamper-evidence or hash-chaining claim. audit_trail, audit_trail_immutable and explainability are all recorded as no public information. For an agent that publishes to a brand's own LinkedIn, YouTube, Instagram, Ghost and WordPress channels, the absence of any published record of what it posted is material rather than routine.

Rests on Explainability, Audit trail and Tamper-evident log, recorded as undisclosed and cited below. For a 0 that absence is the finding. What a score rests on

Are compliance obligations attached per engagement?

Nothing published. The capture carries no certification, no named auditor or report, no regulatory posture, and no terms-of-service, acceptable-use or privacy content. compliance_certs, regulatory_alignment, usage_restrictions and data_handling are all recorded as no public information. One line could be mistaken for a compliance statement and is not: "You own the content you create. Commercial rights included." is an intellectual-property assurance about output ownership, not a certification or a regulatory commitment.

Rests on Usage restrictions, Data handling, Compliance certifications and Regulatory alignment, recorded as undisclosed and cited below. For a 0 that absence is the finding. What a score rests on

Does payment depend on a verified result?

Payment is prepaid usage credits consumed per generation - "Pay as you use", "Only pay when you create" - and credits are spent whether or not the output is used, published or performs. That is squarely the rubric's 0 band: paid per unit of consumption regardless of result. No settlement mechanism, escrow, milestone or outcome condition is published, and outcome_based_pricing and settlement_mechanism are both no public information. The page's "2-3X Compounding Brand Presence" and "80-90% Bandwidth and Turnaround Time Saved" figures are marketing outcome claims, not payment terms, and nothing ties payment to them.

Rests on Pricing model, each cited below. Also named Outcome-based pricing and Settlement mechanism, which our record now shows as undisclosed; that part of the support no longer holds. What a score rests on

This score counts Outcome-based pricing as undisclosed, and that absence is flagged for review — the cited source may address it. If so, this score is too low. How we check absences

Can the deployment be insured, and is the customer indemnified?

No cover and no indemnity of any kind. No carrier, no published limit, no customer indemnity and no liability cap appear anywhere in the capture - insurance_available, insurance_carriers, coverage_limits, indemnification and liability_cap are all recorded as no public information. One heading invites a reader to expect more and does not deliver it: "Custom SLAs" introduces a done-for-you content-operations service ("We run your content operations ... delivered as a service"), not a service-level commitment with remedies, and sla_terms is likewise no public information.

Rests on Indemnification, Insurance carriers, Insurance available, Coverage limits and Liability cap, recorded as undisclosed and cited below. For a 0 that absence is the finding. What a score rests on